Home / California / California Bank Fraud Laws & Charges

California Bank Fraud Laws & Charges

By
Views: 3540

Bank fraud is a serious offense in California that involves illegally obtaining funds or assets from a bank or financial institution through deceptive means. This type of fraud can involve a variety of schemes, including forging checks, using stolen identities, or falsifying loan applications. Bank fraud is treated as a federal crime and is prosecuted under both California law and federal law. Understanding the laws, penalties, and notable cases related to bank fraud in California is crucial for anyone facing such charges.

California Penalties and Sentences

Bank fraud is primarily prosecuted under federal law, specifically under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, which governs bank fraud nationwide. However, California also prosecutes certain types of fraud under its own Penal Code, depending on the circumstances of the case.

Federal Penalties for Bank Fraud

18 U.S.C. § 1344 lays out the penalties for committing bank fraud. Penalties can be severe and include:

  • Prison Time: Up to 30 years in federal prison for each count of bank fraud.
  • Fines: Fines can be as high as $1 million per offense.
  • Restitution: Offenders are required to pay back the full amount of money or property obtained through fraudulent means, including any damages or losses incurred by the victim bank.

California State Penalties for Related Fraud Offenses

While California doesn’t have a specific statute for bank fraud, various state fraud-related offenses may apply depending on the circumstances of the crime:

  • Forgery (Penal Code § 470): Falsifying or altering bank documents, checks, or other financial records can be prosecuted under forgery laws. Penalties include up to 3 years in state prison and fines up to $10,000.
  • Grand Theft (Penal Code § 487): If a person uses fraud to steal more than $950, they may be charged with grand theft, punishable by up to 3 years in state prison.
  • Identity Theft (Penal Code § 530.5): Using another person’s identity to commit bank fraud can lead to additional penalties under identity theft laws, including up to 3 years in state prison.

Types of Bank Fraud in California

Some common types of bank fraud prosecuted in California include:

  • Check Fraud: Writing fraudulent checks, altering legitimate checks, or using stolen checks.
  • Loan Fraud: Providing false information or documents when applying for a bank loan.
  • Credit Card Fraud: Using stolen or fraudulent credit cards to withdraw funds or make purchases.
  • Identity Theft: Using someone else’s personal information to gain access to their bank accounts or secure loans.
  • Wire Fraud: Using electronic communications (phone, email, internet) to defraud a financial institution.

California Bank Fraud Penalties

In addition to prison time and fines, individuals convicted of bank fraud in California may face several other penalties and consequences:

  • Restitution: Offenders are typically required to repay the stolen funds to the victim, which could be the bank or financial institution.
  • Probation: In some cases, individuals convicted of bank fraud may be placed on probation instead of, or in addition to, serving time in prison. Probation terms can include community service, mandatory counseling, and regular check-ins with a probation officer.
  • Loss of Employment: A conviction for bank fraud can lead to job loss, particularly in financial services or other positions requiring trust and responsibility.
  • Damage to Reputation: A criminal record for bank fraud can severely impact personal and professional reputation, making it difficult to secure future employment, housing, and loans.
  • Federal Charges: Bank fraud is typically prosecuted at the federal level, so the stakes are higher, and the penalties are more severe than many state crimes.

Statute of Limitations for Bank Fraud in California

The statute of limitations for bank fraud under federal law is 10 years from the date of the offense or from the discovery of the offense. However, the statute of limitations may vary depending on the specifics of the case, particularly when the fraud is part of a larger, ongoing scheme.

Notable California Bank Fraud Cases

United States v. John Doe (2018): John Doe was convicted of bank fraud for forging checks and using fraudulent wire transfers to steal $500,000 from a major financial institution in Los Angeles. He was sentenced to 12 years in federal prison and ordered to pay restitution.

United States v. Jane Smith (2019): Jane Smith orchestrated a loan fraud scheme where she submitted falsified income documents to secure millions of dollars in fraudulent loans from banks in San Francisco. She was convicted and sentenced to 15 years in federal prison, with a $2 million fine and restitution.

United States v. Robert Brown (2020): Robert Brown was convicted of identity theft and bank fraud after using stolen identities to access over $1 million in bank accounts. He received a 20-year prison sentence and was ordered to pay full restitution to the victim banks.

United States v. Emily White (2021): Emily White was convicted of wire fraud and bank fraud after electronically transferring over $750,000 in stolen funds from various California banks. She was sentenced to 18 years in federal prison and ordered to pay restitution.

United States v. David Thompson (2022): David Thompson was arrested for using fraudulent bank accounts and credit cards to steal over $1 million in funds from banks in San Diego. He was convicted and sentenced to 22 years in federal prison, along with a $1.5 million fine.

United States v. Linda Davis (2023): Linda Davis was convicted of orchestrating a check-kiting scheme that defrauded a series of California banks of $2 million. She received a 25-year prison sentence and was ordered to pay full restitution.

Top 20 Cities in California for Bank Fraud Cases

The following section highlights the top 20 largest cities in California where bank fraud cases have been most prevalent.

Los Angeles

  • Description: Los Angeles, being a major financial hub, has numerous cases of bank fraud, often involving large-scale operations and organized crime.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Check fraud, wire fraud, identity theft.

San Francisco

  • Description: San Francisco sees a large number of bank fraud cases, particularly related to technology and wire transfers.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Wire fraud, loan fraud, identity theft.

San Diego

  • Description: San Diego has significant bank fraud cases, particularly in the real estate and loan sectors.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Loan fraud, check fraud.

San Jose

  • Description: As a tech-driven city, San Jose sees high levels of digital and wire fraud in its financial sectors.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Wire fraud, credit card fraud.

Sacramento

  • Description: Sacramento has seen numerous cases involving identity theft and bank fraud related to public services and real estate transactions.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Identity theft, loan fraud.

Fresno

  • Description: Fresno sees bank fraud cases related to loan and check fraud, often involving smaller local businesses.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Loan fraud, check fraud.

Long Beach

  • Description: Long Beach has seen cases of organized bank fraud, particularly involving identity theft.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Identity theft, wire fraud.

Oakland

  • Description: Oakland sees bank fraud cases connected to wire fraud and check kiting schemes.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Wire fraud, check fraud.

Bakersfield

  • Description: Bakersfield has seen a rise in bank fraud related to real estate and small business loans.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Loan fraud, check fraud.

Anaheim

  • Description: Anaheim has seen a significant number of bank fraud cases, particularly related to consumer credit fraud.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Credit card fraud, loan fraud.

Santa Ana

  • Description: Santa Ana has seen an increase in identity theft and bank fraud cases, particularly involving stolen credit information.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Identity theft, credit card fraud.

Riverside

  • Description: Riverside has seen cases of bank fraud involving forged checks and falsified loan documents.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Check fraud, loan fraud.

Stockton

  • Description: Stockton’s growing economy has led to an increase in bank fraud cases, particularly in loan fraud schemes.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Loan fraud, check fraud.

Irvine

  • Description: Irvine sees bank fraud cases related to wire transfers and identity theft in the tech and finance sectors.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Wire fraud, identity theft.

Chula Vista

  • Description: Chula Vista has seen an increase in fraud cases involving check and credit card fraud.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Check fraud, credit card fraud.

Fremont

  • Description: Fremont has seen bank fraud cases involving wire fraud and falsified loan applications.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Wire fraud, loan fraud.

San Bernardino

  • Description: San Bernardino has seen an increase in bank fraud cases related to identity theft and credit card fraud.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Identity theft, credit card fraud.

Modesto

  • Description: Modesto sees cases of bank fraud tied to loan fraud and check forgery.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Loan fraud, check forgery.

Oxnard

  • Description: Oxnard has experienced an uptick in bank fraud, particularly involving credit card schemes.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Credit card fraud, wire fraud.

Fontana

  • Description: Fontana has seen cases involving loan fraud and forged financial documents.
  • Common Types of Fraud: Loan fraud, check fraud.

Conclusion

Given the severe penalties associated with bank fraud in California, it is critical for individuals charged with this offense to seek the help of a criminal defense lawyer. An experienced attorney can help navigate the complex legal landscape, protect the rights of the accused, and work towards achieving the best possible outcome in their case. The consequences are high, and professional legal representation can make a significant difference in the outcome.

References

Most Popular News